Thursday, July 10, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
Parliamentobserver
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Healthcare
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Business
  • Login
No Result
View All Result
Parliamentobserver
Home Business

Determining systematic differences in human graders for machine learning-based automated hiring

Dennis Rogers by Dennis Rogers
September 29, 2022
in Business
0
Determining systematic differences in human graders for machine learning-based automated hiring
0
SHARES
19
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

By Mike H. M. Teodorescu, Nailya Ordabayeva, Marios Kokkodis, Abhishek Unnam, Varun Aggarwal

Related posts

The $14.6 Billion Question: What the Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in History Means for Medical Leaders and Investors

The $14.6 Billion Question: What the Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in History Means for Medical Leaders and Investors

July 8, 2025
Instant Cargo Analysis 24/7: How XRF Analyzer Speeds Up Quality Control for Raw Materials

Instant Cargo Analysis 24/7: How XRF Analyzer Speeds Up Quality Control for Raw Materials

July 8, 2025

Abstract

Firms routinely utilize natural language processing combined with other machine learning (ML) tools to assess prospective employees through automated resume classification based on pre-codified skill databases. The rush to automation can however backfire by encoding unintentional bias against groups of candidates. We run two experiments with human evaluators from two different countries to determine how cultural differences may affect hiring decisions. We use hiring materials provided by an international skill testing firm which runs hiring assessments for Fortune 500 companies. The company conducts a video-based interview assessment using machine learning, which grades job applicants automatically based on verbal and visual cues. Our study has three objectives: to compare the automatic assessments of the video interviews to assessments of the same interviews by human graders in order to assess how they differ; to examine which characteristics of human graders may lead to systematic differences in their assessments; and to propose a method to correct human evaluations using automation. We find that systematic differences can exist across human graders and that some of these differences can be accounted for by an ML tool if measured at the time of training.

Download the full working paper here.

Principal Investigator Mike Teodorescu was funded by a USAID grant through a Visiting Scholar position at Massachusetts Institute of Technology, D-Lab, which helped pay for research assistants and experiment expenses. Professors Mike Teodorescu, Nailya Ordabayeva, and Marios Kokkodis received summer research support from Boston College.

Aspiring Minds (acquired by SHL in 2020), the organization which provided data access, had the opportunity to review the content of this working paper. Varun Aggarwal is Chief AI Officer at SHL. Other than the aforementioned, the authors did not receive financial support from any firm or person for this article or from any firm or person with a financial or political interest in this article. Other than the aforementioned, the authors are not currently an officer, director, or board member of any organization with a financial or political interest in this article.

Previous Post

FDA user fee reauthorization: Contextualizing the VALID Act

Next Post

How satellites and AI can fix development data problems

Next Post
How satellites and AI can fix development data problems

How satellites and AI can fix development data problems

RECOMMENDED NEWS

PRIVATE BLOG – The West is Pleading For Putin to Invade

PRIVATE BLOG – The West is Pleading For Putin to Invade

3 years ago

France Revokes Nearly 4 Million Vaccine Passports

3 years ago
Dividing the World Economy = Economic Decline

Dividing the World Economy = Economic Decline

3 years ago
Ketanji Brown Jackson is Neither a Biologist nor Fit for the Supreme Court

Ketanji Brown Jackson is Neither a Biologist nor Fit for the Supreme Court

3 years ago

BROWSE BY CATEGORIES

  • Business
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

POPULAR NEWS

  • Klaus Schwab – The Most Dangerous Man in the World

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Dr. Robert Malone v WEF

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Ukraine Adopts WEF Proposals

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Trudeau Backs Down After Banks Scream about Massive Withdrawals

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
  • Trudeau’s Approval Rating Hits 12-Month Low

    0 shares
    Share 0 Tweet 0
Parliamentobserver

We bring you latest news about ecology, economy, healthcare, politics, education, business.

Recent News

  • The $14.6 Billion Question: What the Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in History Means for Medical Leaders and Investors
  • Instant Cargo Analysis 24/7: How XRF Analyzer Speeds Up Quality Control for Raw Materials
  • HIT-NOT reduces forklift accidents and increases safety in logistics

Category

  • Business
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Education
  • Healthcare
  • Politics
  • Uncategorized

Recent News

The $14.6 Billion Question: What the Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in History Means for Medical Leaders and Investors

The $14.6 Billion Question: What the Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in History Means for Medical Leaders and Investors

July 8, 2025
Instant Cargo Analysis 24/7: How XRF Analyzer Speeds Up Quality Control for Raw Materials

Instant Cargo Analysis 24/7: How XRF Analyzer Speeds Up Quality Control for Raw Materials

July 8, 2025
  • About Us
  • Contact Us

© 2022 parliamentobserver.com Submit news release

No Result
View All Result
  • Ecology
  • Economy
  • Healthcare
  • Politics
  • Education
  • Business

© 2022 parliamentobserver.com Submit news release

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In