COMMENT: There has been and is increasing talk in all media of a coming ‘civil war’. Your article ‘Bidenomics & Vilification of Trump’ well explains the intentional polarization of the public and clearly states this will only end very badly.
The CW of 1861 Blue vs Grey, North vs South was a war of geography – of brother vs brother if one lived in a Blue state and the other in a Grey state. Armies were formed and deployed based on geography as much as ideology.
Now we have talk of a civil war between ‘patriots’ DJT supporters versus I guess the rest of everyone else, or so it is threatened to be by the media pundents and alarmists. But Martin, this smells like a classic psychological operation employing all of the media and a tiny element of probably paid for) violent extremists who like to dress in all black.
But how many Karen and Kens (Ds) are there that would actually take up arms because they don’t like Trump? How many because they love their electric cars? Will they begin shooting neighbors because of global warming?
The D politicians have never been able to provide any positive based reasons why they should be elected – only that they are anti-opponent – that might get a few votes but will not create an army. Your neighbor may be a liberal voter but is he armed and ready to start killing for these reasons? I think not.
Except for the DS/WEF/Globalists gang and probably a number of their armed 3 letter agencies. They control the media, have the jails, and the domestic physical enforcement personnel. They can use the media to try and create chaos, to cause false flag events in their favor, and shape public thought, and intern “create a media based CW”. A Wag The Dog CW.
They are the opposition – the enemy – the real danger. Do their combined numbers who could and actually would take up arms against the pubic even come to 1% of the nation? I doubt it.
Have a CW against this 1% and you could call it “the most civilized war a civilized society could possibly have”. IMO, this should be done by the professionals as soon as yesterday. Gitmo and military justice for treason.
REPLY: It is the vilification of one person that is then applied to all those on the opposite side that starts the division. It does not matter who or the cause. History is littered with two opposing sides. The more they can inspire hatred, the less the people think independently and become just mindless drones.
History whispers to us from the past because the one thing that is constant has always been human nature. It really does not matter whatever the issue might be. Perhaps the most dominant reason has often been religion. Nero used that to blame the Christians for burning down Rome. The Diocletianic or Great Persecution was the last and most severe persecution of Christians in the Roman Empire. This again was not out of personal hatred of Christians. This was after the Monetary collapse of Rome during the 260-268 AD time frame. Diocletian (284-305 AD) persecuted the Christians because the general belief was that the gods were causing Rome to collapse BECAUSE of the Christians who were disrespecting the gods.
There was another religion rising known as the Manicheans. Diocletian issued an edict in 302 AD against them as well for the very same reason — they were offending the gods who were punishing Rome. They were founded in the Persian Empire, known as the Sassanid Empire, and were followers of the prophet Mani (216-c.276). This became another widespread religion that infiltrated Rome, India, and China. It was based on a dualistic theology in which the theory was that the universe was divided between the divine plane of light and our own material plane of darkness. The Father of Greatness was not omnipotent, but he ruled the realm of light. Its opposite, the material realm was controlled by the King of Darkness. These two forces did battle on both a cosmic and a personal level. Thus, within each individual soul, there was a battle. Manichaeism was clearly influenced by several other religions, including Buddhism, Christianity, and Zoroastrianism.
So, no matter where we look in history, there is this eternal conflict between two ideas — left v right. The media is fueling the hatred of Trump, and as we can see the new strategy is to hate Republicans for the November election when Trump is not running. But they are portraying him as evil, and he now controls all Republicans, so you better vote Democrat. That is the message being sent out all over.
Here is a coin of Postumus who led the separation of Spain, France, and Britain from the Roman Empire. First, he was not trying to be another general who conquered Rome. He was pushing for separation and his coinage declared that he was “restoring” the region to sanity and safety. This is the most likely way we will see the United States split, as is the case in Europe, which will probably precede. I do not see armed armies leading the charge, nor do I see your neighbor picking up a gun and storming your house because you are the evil opposition. They will probably not speak to you, and that is how it will begin.
Armies are created by the rulers. They demonize their opponent to get the people to be willing to die on the battlefield for some noble cause. The US Civil War was promoted on religious grounds. There were slave owners who abused their slaves and beat them, and the majority did not. The worst part of slavery was they could sell your wife or child. That was different from serfdom, where you were attached to the land and could not be sold individually.
The South fought over state’s rights which they want to deny today, but economically, slaves were valuable. It all began with indentured servants, which were people in England sold to a plantation owner for their sentence of 2 or 5 years for a misdemeanor crime. That is why the Constitution forbids indentured servitude.
Ending slavery was taking away the workforce, and it meant economic destruction. The vast majority of soldiers who fought for the South were not slave owners. They fought against Federalism that was dictating what their economy should have been. The vast majority of solider in the Confederate Army did not have the wealth to own slaves. They were very expensive. For the majority, it was really about Federalism and independence. Sure, the “rich” had their plantations and slaves. They were not out there fighting in the trenches. Confederal Army’s First Conscription Act in 1862 aged 18 to 35. But the Third Conscription Act in 1864 changed it to 17 to 50.
Historically, the US will split along the same lines. The middle of the country will join with the South up to Montana. This will divide the nation into three parts as what took place in Rome. The Pacific States will be California, Oregon, and Washington. I am surprised that Washington State has not moved to rename itself Wokeville since George Washington inherited enslaved people at the early age of eleven and was, therefore, a slave owner. Thomas Jefferson also inherited slaves with his wife. They have removed his statues in NYC already! The man who wrote the Declaration of Independence.
I would not expect the separation to come by force of arms. We will see this rise to a voting issue on both sides. Already on the 2022 ballot will be a question to secede from the United States in Texas and California. There are people talking about it here in Florida. The more Washington, DC tries to impose its dictates on the States, we will see the rise in calling for secession from the US. This was to be a union that retained state sovereignty.
That was the US civil war, and it will be again. But now, under a different issue from slavery to economic slavery, climate mandates, vaccine mandates, and who knows what’s next — chip implants? Federalism is once again the enemy and civilization forms when everyone comes together for a mutual benefit. Once you begin to impose the will of one side upon another, the very reason to stay together in civilization comes to an end. Just listen to history. This is the driving force behind the rise and fall of every civilization.
The post The Coming Civil War first appeared on Armstrong Economics.